I like, and appreciate, the composers position here. One of an open dialog which, in apposing each the other, common ground might be found. The open bashing of one another is primitive at best and resolves nothing in my opinion. So this is a welcome change.
Last night Bill Nye the Science Guy and Ken Ham of the Creation Museum debated whether creation is a viable model of origins in today’s modern scientific era. No matter what side of the topic you find yourself on I hope you appreciated the honest discussion that happened last night. Too many times both the creation and evolution sides take a stance that does not allow any room for the others point of view.
Creationist take the stance well “God said it, I believe it, that settles it.” Their evolutionist counterparts say that’s just an book(The Bible) that denies science and you’re uneducated for those beliefs. Both stands are wrong in my opinion because they are to such extremes there is no middle ground in common and each can speak to their blue in the face or it becomes a shouting match.
Last night each man made valid points for his…
View original post 268 more words
altruistico 