Little is known about Luke, the author of the books of Luke and Acts in the Bible. We do know he was a physician and the only Gentile to write any part of the New Testament. Paul’s letter to the Colossians draws a distinction between Luke and other colleagues “of the circumcision,” meaning the Jews (Colossians 4:11). Luke is the only New Testament writer clearly identifiable as a non-Jew.
Luke was the author of the gospel of Luke and the book of Acts. Luke does not name himself in either of his books, but Paul mentions him by name in three epistles. Both Luke and Acts are addressed to the same person, Theophilus (Luke 1:3; Acts 1:1). No one knows exactly who Theophilus was, but we know that Luke’s purpose in writing the two companion books was so that Theophilus would know with certainty about the person and work of Jesus Christ (Luke 1:4). Perhaps Theophilus had already received the basics of the Christian doctrine but had not as yet been completely grounded in them.
Luke was a close friend of Paul, who referred to him as “the beloved physician” (Colossians 4:14). Perhaps Luke’s interest in medicine is the reason his gospel gives such a high profile to Jesus’ acts of healing.
Paul also refers to Luke as a “fellow laborer” (Philemon 1:24). Luke joined Paul in Troas in Asia Minor during Paul’s second missionary journey (Acts 16:6–11). Some scholars speculate that Luke was the “man of Macedonia” whom Paul saw in his dream (Acts 16:9). Luke was left in Philippi during the second missionary journey (Acts 17:1) and picked up again to travel with Paul in the third journey (Acts 20:5). Luke accompanied Paul on his journey to Jerusalem and Rome and was with him during his imprisonment there (2 Timothy 4:11). Luke’s vivid description of his travels with Paul in Acts 27 seem to indicate that he was well-traveled and well-versed in navigation.
Scholars have noted that Luke had an outstanding command of the Greek language. His vocabulary is extensive and rich, and his style at times approaches that of classical Greek, as in the preface of his gospel (Luke 1:1–4), while at other times it seems quite Semitic (Luke 1:5—2:52). He was familiar with sailing and had a special love for recording geographical details. All this would indicate that Luke was a well-educated, observant, and careful writer.
This is an excellent post. Luke could not have been the Macedonian Paul saw in his vision because verse 11 says, “So, setting sail from Troas, WE made a direct voyage to Samothrace, and the following day to Neapolis.” Luke was apparently a resident of Troas who joined Paul’s team just before he saw the vision.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, Clyde;
I tend to agree with you and your observations. I believe we get some confirmation in Gal. 4:13 and Acts 18:23. I commend you, my friend, on making a very good observation and disclosure of Biblical facts. Keep up your good works.
May the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob continue to bless you and yours.
Yours in Christ;
Michael
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
LikeLike
As always, Vincent, I do thank you for your continued good work in helping to spread the Word of God and His messages. You are so greatly appreciated.
May the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob continue to bless you and yours.
Yours in Christ;
Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure Michael and likewise my friend 😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good post on Luke.
LikeLike
Thank you, Slim. Your comment is greatly appreciated.
May the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob continue to bless you and yours.
Yours in Christ;
Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good stuff, quite helpful and informative. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kenneth;
I want first to apologize for the delay in responding to your comment. I, most recently, have been going through some health issues of which sometimes leave me quite fatigued and unable to do all I wish I were able to achieve. Please forgive me for this ailment and for the delay in my response. It was not my intension to postpone addressing and acknowledging you and your comment.
I also want to thank you for your visit here to altruistico and for your following this blog. I trust it will give you information and an opportunity to grow in Christian faith and knowledge. You are always welcome here and appreciated deeply.
I want to thank you, Kenneth for your comment. It is always greatly appreciated.
May the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob continue to bless you and yours.
Yours in Christ;
Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Micheal, thanks a lot for your encouragement. May God help you to keep up with your exhortations here. May you grow more and more to knowledge of Him and the hope that is in Christ Jesus.
Enjoying reading your blog. Thanks.
LikeLike
I have heard it said and observed that the Book of Matthew speaks of Jesus as our King, the Book of Mark speaks of Jesus as a servant, the Book of Luke speaks of Jesus as our savior, and the Book of John speaks of Jesus as our God. So it seems appropriate that a gentile wrote the Book of Luke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, my friend and thank you, as always, for your comment. It is always greatly appreciated.
You raise, as always, a good and valid point. It is rather ironic, I think, that Luke being a physician and spiritual leader; never performed a healing that was a miracle. After Jesus physically left earth and the apostles were leaders of the church, they were commissioned with the gospel and authority to do as Jesus did.
Acts 3:2-6: “And a certain man lame from his mother’s womb was carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful, to ask alms from those who entered the temple; who, seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple, asked for alms. And fixing his eyes on him, with John, Peter said, “Look at us.” So he gave them his attention, expecting to receive something from them. Then Peter said, “Silver and gold I do not have, but what I do have I give you: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up and walk.”
The man at the Gate beautiful was not seeking healing but money, he had no faith. John and Peter might of walked by this man a number of times to the temple but on this certain day they were moved to raise him up from his sick bed.
Miracles through the apostles became widespread outside of Israel to the Gentiles. In 1 Timothy 5:23 Paul had Timothy to take wine for medicinal purposes. Lack of Faith was not the problem. 2 Timothy 4:20 says: “Trophemus I left in Miletus sick.” Trophemus a companion of Paul was left as Paul went on ministering, he did not encourage him to have faith to be healed. In Philippians 2:26, 30 mentions Epaphroditus as a devoted servant of the Lord; he became sick and stayed that way for some time and almost died. We see their prayers were answered by God’s will and in his timing. All Christians should pray for God to heal when it is needed.
In 2 Corinthians 12:9-10 Paul had a thorn in the flesh In Vv.9-10 Paul laments “Concerning this thing I pleaded with the Lord three times that it might depart from me. And He said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness.” God denied Paul to be healed for a reason. So to say everyone must be healed because of what Jesus did on the cross is wrong, the gospel is primarily about forgiveness of sin.
Thank you once again, Tom, for your comment and loyalty to Christ. Both are always greatly appreciated.
May the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob continue to bless you and yours.
Yours in Christ;
Michael
LikeLike